Portabilidade, Evanescências e Rubricas: Discussões em torno da Literatura Digital na Sala de Aula

  • Alamir Aquino Corrêa Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Abstract

This paper addresses three issues affecting the attempt to teach digital literary texts in the classroom by observing their implications for pedagogical practice in the preparation of future teachers. The integrity of the digital object and its reception, which I call portability, is discussed through the modes of engagement with the text and its unlikely or difficult reproducibility as an aesthetic experience in the classroom. In the case of evanescence, both the access to the aesthetic experience and the study as criticism become problematic due to obstacles like geo-referencing, copyright issues, object transience, and obsolescence of software and hardware. Finally, the guidelines for the reading experience not only organize but also impose a priori limits to the perception of the literary object.

  • Abstract viewed = 271 times
  • HTML (Português (Portugal)) viewed = 46 times
  • PDF (Português (Portugal)) viewed = 40 times

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alamir Aquino Corrêa, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Departamento de Letras Vernáculas e Clássicas

Teoria literária e Literatura brasileira

References

ATTIAH, Karen (2015). “How Western media would cover Baltimore if it happened elsewhere.” Washington Post 30 abr.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/04/30/how-western-media-would-cover-baltimore-if-it-happened-elsewhere/?postshare=401430447574070.

BAGGI, Cristiane Aparecida dos Santos, Doraci Alves Lopes (2011). “Evasão e avaliação institucional no ensino superior: uma discussão bibliográfica.” Avaliação 16.2 (jul.): 355-374.
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aval/v16n2/a07v16n2.

BAKHTIN, Mikhail (2002). Questões de Literatura e Estética. São Paulo: Hucitec.

BENNETT, Sue, Karl Maton, Lisa Kervin (2008). “The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of evidence.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39.5: 775-786. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x.

BOLTER, Jay David (2007). “Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit?” Criticism 49.1 (winter): 107-118.
http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/ vol49/iss1/5.

BOLTER, Jay David, Richard Grusin (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

CAMPOS, Augusto (2003). Não: Poemas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.

COLLINS, Jim (2010). Bring on the Books for Everybody: How Literary Culture Became Popular Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.

CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2012). “Is Jorge Amado the gateway to Brazil or not?” Comparative Literature Studies 49.3: 361-371.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/complitstudies.49.3.0361.

CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2014). “Aspectos Antitéticos entre Apeirokalia e Liberdade Criadora na Arte Digital.” Criação Digital: Prática e Reflexão. Eds. Cláudia G. Vilarouca, Otávio G. Tavares e Cláudio A. C. Moura. Florianópolis: Copiart. 46-58.

CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2016). “Tecnología y la poesía en Brasil: lo visual, lo sonoro y el nuevo ‘bello’ posible.” Poesía y Poéticas digitales / Electrónicas / Tecnos / New-media en América Latina: Definiciones y Exploraciones. Eds. Luis Correa-Díaz e Scott Weintraub. Bogotá: Universidad Central. 637-664. http://www.ucentral.edu.co/editorial/catalogo/poesia-poeticas-digitales.

EARHART, Amy E. (2012). “Can Information Be Unfettered? Race and the New Digital Humanities Canon.” Debates in the Digital Humanities. Ed. Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 309-318.

FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2007). Prehistoric Digital Poetry an Archaeology of Forms. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.

FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2008). “Digital Poetry: A Look at Generative, Visual, and Interconnected Possibilities in its First Four Decades.” A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. Eds. Susan Schreibman e Ray Siemens. Oxford: Blackwell. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companionDLS/.

FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2012). New Directions in Digital Poetry. New York: Continuum.

GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor (1989). Culturas Híbridas: Estrategias para Entrar y Salir de la Modernidad. México: Grijalbo.

GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor (2004). Diferentes, Desiguales y Desconectados. Barcelona: Gedisa.

GIAMPÁ, Daniele (2010). Testo e Tessuto. Parla come Navighi. Antologia della Webletteratura Italiana. Ed. Mario Gerosa. Piombino: Associazone Culturale Il Foglio. http://elmcip.net/node/10384.

HARTLING, Florian (2005). “The Canonization of German-language Digital Literature.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 7.4
http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1281.

HAYLES, N. Katherine (2008). Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

JONES, Christopher, Binhui Shao (2011). The Net Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/node/4011.

JUVAN, Marco (2000). “On Literariness: From Post-Structuralism to Systems Theory.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 2.2.
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol2/iss2/.

KIRCHOF, Edgar R. (2013). “Desafios para o ensino da literatura digital.” Revista da ANPOLL 35: 127-142.
http://www.anpoll.org.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/647/716.

KIRSCHENBAUM, Matthew G. (2008). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge: MIT.

KNEWTON. Flipped classroom. http://www.knewton.com/flipped-classroom/.

LANDOW, George P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

LAVAGNINO, John (2008). “Digital and Analog Texts. A Companion to Digital Literary Studies.” Eds. Susan Schreibman e Ray Siemens. Oxford: Blackwell. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companionDLS/.

PAYNE, Susan E. (2013). “Teaching Today's “Digital Native” College Student.” North American Professors of Christian Education Conference: papers. http://www.napce.org/documents/!pdfs/papers-2013/payne.pdf.

PRENSKY, Marc (2001). “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.” On the Horizon 9.5: 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/10748120110424816.

PRENSKY, Marc (2010). Teaching Digital Natives: Partnering for Real Learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

PRESSMAN, Jessica (2014). Digital Modernism: Making it New in New Media. New York: Oxford U P.

PRESSMAN, Jessica, and Lisa Swanstrom (2013). “The Literary And/As the Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quaterly 7.1.
http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000154/000154.html.

PRICE, Kenneth M., Ray Siemens (2014). “Introduction.” Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology.
https://dlsanthology.commons.mla.org/introduction/.

RETTBERG, Scott (2013). “An Emerging Canon? A Preliminary Analysis of All References to Creative Works in Critical Writing Documented in the ELMCIP Electronic Literature Knowledge Base.” Elmcip.
http://elmcip.net/criticalwriting/emerging-canon-preliminary-analysis-all-references-creative-works-critical-writing.

RONSON, Jon (2015). “How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life.” The New York Times Magazine 12 fev.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html?_r=0.

SANTOS, Alckmar Luiz dos (2003). Leituras de Nós: Ciberespaço e Literatura. São Paulo: Itaú Cultural.

SANZ, Amelia (2013). “Digital Humanities or Hypercolonial Studies.” http://responsible-innovation.org.uk/torrii/sites/default/files/Final%20_sanz_hypercolonial_sent3.pdf.

SCHOLES, Robert (1985). Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English. New Haven: Yale University Press.

SIMANOWSKI, Roberto, Jörgen Schäffer, Peter Gendolla (2010). Reading Moving Letters: Digital Literature in Research and Teaching. New Brunswick: Transcript.

SMITH, Erika (2013). “Are Adult Educators and Learners ‘Digital Immigrants’? Examining the Evidence and Impacts for Continuing Education.” Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education 39.1 (spring): 1-13. https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjuce-rcepu/article/viewFile/20722/15827.

STOKES, Suzanne (2001). “Visual Literacy in Teaching and Learning: A Literature Perspective.” Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education 1.1. http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume1No1/Stokes.html.

TWEEDIE, Eddie (2015). “Google’s New Classroom App Lets Kids Turn In Homework With Their Phones.” Business Insider.
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-classroom-app-lets-kids-turn-in-homework-with-their-phones-2015-1.

UNESCO. Institute for Information Technologies in Education (2011). Policy Brief – Digital Natives: How do They Learn? How to Teach Them? http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214698.pdf.

WOODALL, Stephen (2014). “Radical Publishing: The Organization and Distribution of Art, Literature and Information in the 21st Century.” Eds. Dennis Reidsma, Insook Choi e Robin Bargar. Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. Cham: Springer. 123-127.

YOO, Hyun-Joo (2007). Text, Hypertext, Hypermedia. Ästhetische Möglichkeiten der digitalen Literatur mittels Intertextualität, Interaktivität und Intermedialität. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Published
2016-07-11
How to Cite
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino. Portabilidade, Evanescências e Rubricas: Discussões em torno da Literatura Digital na Sala de Aula. MATLIT: Materialities of Literature, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 233-253, july 2016. ISSN 2182-8830. Available at: <http://impactum-journals.uc.pt/matlit/article/view/2251>. Date accessed: 23 may 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830.
Section
Secção Temática | Thematic Section

Keywords

digital literature in the classroom; pedagogy for the teaching of digital literature; portability; evanescence; guidelines